The MSW Management Blogs

The Blogger

John Trotti MSW Management Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Crude Thoughts Revisited
  2. Prepping for Change
  3. Building on Your Staff's Strengths
  4. It Always Helps to Know Where You Are
  5. WASTECON August 15-17 Boston
  6. What to Do With the Glop From the Gulf
  7. The Curse of Stranded Investment
  8. Complacency Our Constant Companion
  9. Meeting Long Neglected Societal Needs
  10. Why Are We Here
  11. Waste Expo 2010 Report
  12. WasteExpo Time Again
  13. CTs on the Verge in CA
  14. Landfill Financial Responsibility
  15. Producer Responsibility Marketplace or Mandate
  16. Producer Responsibility
  17. We're Not Alone
  18. SWANA Landfill Gas Symposium 2010
  19. Is Greenwash as Bad as Hogwash
  20. Recycling Accountability
  21. An Antidote to Chaos
  22. Give Free Enterprise a Chance
  23. A Need for Concerted Action
  24. Changes to the Stream
  25. LMOP 2010 40 CFM and Up
  26. MSW as a Security Resource
  27. LMOP Becomes a Teenager
  28. The Changing Landscape of Collection and Transfer Operations
  29. Into the New Year
  30. Every Litter Bit Hurts
  31. Messages From Beyond the Van Allen Belt
  32. It's Not Just a Job; It's an Adventure
  33. Raising the Titanic
  34. How are they doing it
  35. Preparing for the Next Round of Diversion
  36. It's Time to Fall Back
  37. A Pretty Good Storm
  38. Coping With the Change
  39. More on Conversion Technologies
  40. WASTECON 2009 Sustainability and Other Pickens
  41. WASTECON 2009
  42. Up From the Ashes
  43. MSW Training Courses
  44. How's Your 2020 Vision
  45. Bypassing Irreconcilable Differences
  46. EPA's Materials Management Challenge
  47. Waste No More
  48. MSW and Recycling Web-Based Training for New Staff
  49. Green Side Out
  50. WASTECON and Your Waste Board
  51. Technology and Waste
  52. Show Me the Markets
  53. Lean Thinking
  54. Rabbit from the Hat Waste Expo 2009
  55. Some Things Just Take Time
  56. How Are We Going to Pay the Bill
  57. Cases for and Against Going to Waste Expo 2009
  58. Back to Back We Face the Past
  59. Do Sacred Cows Belong in the Wastestream
  60. Where's Howard Beale When We Need Him
  61. Sequestering...Again
  62. Safety on the Worksite
  63. Landfill Futures
  64. Landfill Gas Futures
  65. Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit
  66. A Climate Change at the Sierra Club
  67. Don't Forget the Debrief
  68. Landfill Gas Collection System Efficiencies
  69. Lessons From the Construction Folks
  70. Paperless iMSW Management-i
  71. Dealing with Stranded Investment
  72. GHGs on My Mind
  73. Is the Hierarchy of the 1980s Relevant Today
  74. Back to the Idea of Sequestration
  75. Sustainability in the Face of Shrunken Budgets
  76. Student Public Service
  77. Web Based Training
  78. Are We Wasting an Opportunity
  79. Energy Efficiency, Climate Protection, and MSW Management
  80. Managing Disaster-Generated Waste and Debris
  81. Southern California Fires
  82. When Do Throw-Aways Become Recyclables
  83. Got a Few Minutes to Spare
  84. Classroom Time
  85. How Much Carbon in a Dollar
  86. Waste In the Eye of the Storm
  87. Once More Into the Breech
  88. Rules For a New Ball Game
  89. An Environmental Case for Running a Tight Ship
  90. Feel-Good Environmentalism The Smog Pump Approach to Waste Diversion
  91. Feel-Good Environmentalism
  92. Technology, Trash, and Our Workforce of the Future
  93. A World Lit by More Than Fire
  94. An End to Outsourcing
  95. What's Your Tolerance for Drug and Alcohol Abuse
  96. Why an MSW Management Newsletter
  97. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

MSW Editor's Blog

July 20th, 2009 10:25am PST

Sustainability Product Index

Posted By John Trotti 2 Comments

Last week I received the following from Walmart that is self-explanatory:

Walmart Announces Sustainable Product Index

Index will drive higher quality, lower costs, and measure sustainability of products for first time

July 16, 2009—Walmart today announced plans to develop a worldwide sustainable product index during a meeting with 1,500 of its suppliers, associates, and sustainability leaders at its home office. The index will establish a single source of data for evaluating the sustainability of products.

“Customers want products that are more efficient, that last longer, and perform better,” said Mike Duke, Walmart’s president and CEO. “And increasingly they want information about the entire life cycle of a product so they can feel good about buying it. They want to know that the materials in the product are safe, that it was made well and that it was produced in a responsible way.

“We do not see this as a trend that will fade. Higher customer expectations are a permanent part of the future,” Duke continued. “At Walmart, we’re working to make sustainability sustainable, so that it’s a priority in good times and in the tough times. An important part of that is developing the tools to help enable sustainable consumption.”

The company will introduce the initiative in three phases, beginning with a survey of its more than 100,000 suppliers around the world. The survey includes 15 questions [see below] that will serve as a tool for Walmart’s suppliers to evaluate their own sustainability efforts. The questions will focus on four areas: energy and climate; material efficiency; natural resources, and people and community.

“The survey will include simple but powerful questions covering familiar territory, such as the location of our suppliers’ factories, along with new areas like water use and solid waste,” said John Fleming, chief merchandising officer, Walmart US. “The questions aren’t complicated but we’ve never before systematically asked for this kind of information. The survey is a key first step toward establishing real transparency in our supply chain.”

Fleming also said the company will ask its top-tier US suppliers to complete the survey by Oct. 1. Outside the United States, the company will develop timelines on a country-by-country basis for suppliers to complete the survey.

As a second step, the company is helping create a consortium of universities that will collaborate with suppliers, retailers, NGOs, and government to develop a global database of information on the lifecycle of products—from raw materials to disposal. Walmart has provided the initial funding for the Sustainability Index Consortium, and invited all retailers and suppliers to contribute.

The company will also partner with one or more leading technology companies to create an open platform that will power the index.

But according to Duke, the initiative doesn’t stop there. In his address to shareholders, he announced a third element to the plan:

Let me say this clearly. It is not our goal to create or own this Index. We want to spur the development of a common database that will allow the consortium to collect and analyze the knowledge of the global supply chain.

We think this shared database will generate opportunities to be more innovative and to improve the sustainability of products and processes.

It will shift us from traditional retail thinking that is centered around the things that we know we can control….like transportation, packaging and sales…to the invisible impacts on the environment. This will give us a much deeper understanding of the opportunities to making consumption more sustainable.

The third and ultimate step of the Index is to translate the information stored in the database into a simple tool that informs consumers about the sustainability of products.

This will provide customers with the transparency into the quality and history of products that they don’t have today. It will help put them in control and consume in a more sustainable way.

The Question is…

Will this affect sustainability as it applies to solid waste management, as the news release suggests, or is the claim hyperbole?

I have my own thoughts on this, but rather than muddy the waters, I’m going to hold them in abeyance until next week. I want to know (1) what you think about the plan itself and (2) your thoughts on the following questions Walmart is posing in its survey.

Sustainability Product Index: 15 Questions for Suppliers

Energy and Climate: Reducing Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Have you measured your corporate greenhouse gas emissions?

Have you opted to report your greenhouse gas emissions to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)?

What is your total annual greenhouse gas emissions reported in the most recent year measured?

Have you set publicly available greenhouse gas reduction targets? If yes, what are those targets?

Material Efficiency: Reducing Waste and Enhancing Quality

If measured, please report the total amount of solid waste generated from the facilities that produce your product(s) for Walmart for the most recent year measured.

Have you set publicly available solid waste reduction targets? If yes, what are those targets?

If measured, please report total water use from facilities that produce your product(s) for Walmart for the most recent year measured.

Have you set publicly available water use reduction targets? If yes, what are those targets?

Natural Resources: Producing High-Quality, Responsibly Sourced Raw Materials

Have you established publicly available sustainability purchasing guidelines for your direct suppliers that address issues such as environmental compliance, employment practices, and product/ingredient safety?

Have you obtained third-party certifications for any of the products that you sell to Walmart?

People and Community: Ensuring Responsible and Ethical Production

Do you know the location of 100% of the facilities that produce your product(s)?

Before beginning a business relationship with a manufacturing facility, do you evaluate the quality of, and capacity for, production?

Do you have a process for managing social compliance at the manufacturing level?

Do you work with your supply base to resolve issues found during social compliance evaluations and also document specific corrections and improvements?

Do you invest in community development activities in the markets you source from and/or operate within?

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

KEKiernan

July 22nd, 2009 12:48 PM PT

Walmart's decision to develop a sustainability rating for its products could bring about positive changes for their customers and the environment. That the proof will be in the details. Although an important first step is to survey Walmart suppliers about their environmental practices, the second step is where all the details will come to view. So it's good that Walmart is going to take the second step by creating a consortium of universities that will collaborate with suppliers, retailers, nongovernmental organizations and government to develop a global database on the lifecycle of products. This will be a daunting task. Whenever you look at social, environmental and financial costs together you often find there are some competing needs. It is important that as this next step is taken, the consortium be truly collaborative, looking at work already in progress and open to partnerships with others. Right now Walmart is planning to develop some consumer labeling program that will help their customers make informed decisions about the products they buy. King County has had experience with a consumer labeling program for recycled products. We worked with area retailers to promote recycled products in their stores with shelf-talkers, television, newspaper and radio ads as well as other media events. It was a challenge to both raise awareness about the availability of recycled products at the same time encouraging consumers to purchase those products. There are just so many products out there that are not made from recycled materials. Consumer labeling programs can be difficult to develop and sustain (think about the nutritional labeling on our food). We may be more successful in creating a more sustainable environment if all (or most) of the products we buy are more sustainable. Think of the impact Walmart had by stocking only concentrated laundry detergent in smaller packaging. The consumer doesn't have to choose which product is "more sustainable" they just have to go to the store and buy the product. And as recent commenters have noted the proposed index is just one of several steps Walmart, and others, could take to pursue more sustainable business practices. Their web site refers to sustainable buildings, an issue raised below. A Walmart commitment to LEED standards would be an excellent step toward gaining independent verification they are pursuing this goal. Even if the consumer labeling effort does not go forward, having Walmart's suppliers look for ways to improve the environmental impact of their products could result in many positive changes. Looking at environmental costs and benefits through the entire supply chain is also preferred to looking at only part of the supply chain. We look forward to working with Walmart and others as they move forward with their idea of developing a world-wide sustainability index, or perhaps just increase the availability of more sustainable products from their suppliers. They have a very large audience, and raising sustainability issues to their customers can only be a good thing. Kevin Kiernan Division Director, King County Solid Waste Division

Hadfield

July 21st, 2009 1:08 PM PT

I am not a WALMART supporter or shopper so this surprises me. As a mentor of mine often said, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating"! we will just have to wait and see what the outcome will be. I wonder what this "index" will be............if you have a 10, is that good? Or if its only a 3, should we still buy the product?

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get MSW Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our MSW email newsletter!