Advancements in equipment are continually improving efficiency and ergonomics alike.
Semiautomated
collection—and, for some refuse companies, even manual collection—probably will
never go away entirely. The concepts of reducing injuries through advances in
ergonomics and maximizing efficiency to the extent possible short of full
automation are not new ideas to the industry. By now, the equipment marketplace
has responded to increasing demands for the highest possible operational return
on investment by innovating advancements in container tippers and the containers
themselves. And as manufacturers incorporate design advancements into their
equipment, many refuse companies are making greater investments in productivity
by entering the realm of fully automated collection.
Not
surprisingly, the Solid Waste Association of North America 2007 North American
Benchmarking Project for Residential Solid Waste Collection Services indicates
that fully automated collection yields the highest collection service
productivity, although this measurement is subject to such variables as distance
and travel time associated with the trips to and from the landfill, transfer
station, or waste-processing facility, and the variability in the workload that
is assigned to collection crews. Also, despite the increased productivity
yielded by full-automation equipment, the study indicates that increased
productivity is necessary to offset higher capital costs.
Somewhat
surprisingly, the study also indicates that semiautomated collection is often
less efficient than manual collection because a container needs to be returned
to the curb. The main driver in semiautomation, then, is worker safety. A key
piece of equipment in semiautomated collection is the cart tipper.
Tippers
The refuse
collector has a variety of choices in tippers. One manufacturer, Bayne Premium
Lift Systems, lists several questions that the MSW operations manager can ask to
make the choice of tipper easier:
- Which types of carts are used? Not all lifters will work with all carts.
In general, the carts used should conform to ANSI standards Type B for
domestic-style two-bar carts, Type C for European-style carts, Type D for
pocketed-style carts, and Type G for automated-style carts. Many cart lifters
can also dump standard size 30- and 55-gallon drums.
- How much weight will be lifted? The amount of weight to be lifted by the
tipper also is predicated on the choice of cart. Each cart has a weight
rating—for example, a standard 95-gallon cart is usually rated to hold up to 350
pounds. This question is especially important when weight expectations are on
the high end. When equipped with the proper actuator, some cart tippers can lift
up to 700 pounds.
- What is the sill or hopper height of the
refuse collection vehicle? Lifters are available with various arm lengths
because not all models of refuse collection vehicles have the same sill height.
Longer arms are used with higher sills so that when the lifter is mounted in the
correct position on the sill, its faceplate is properly set up to connect with
and dump the cart. Lifters picking up domestic two-bar carts require a clearance
of 34 inches from the ground to the lifter saddle, where the cart bar rests.
European-style carts require a clearance of 38 inches from the ground to the top
of the lifter’s comb assembly.
-
Does the refuse collection vehicle have a winch, reeving cylinder or
commercial container bar? Not all lifters work properly on rear-loaders equipped
with commercial container–handling devices. Modifications may be required to
ensure that a commercial container does not rest on the cart lifter—and thus
damage it—when it is being emptied. In addition, the lifter must be able to
rotate within the opening between a commercial-container bar and the hopper.
- Is a cylinder lift or one that uses a rotary actuator better suited to
the operation? Two basic kinds of cart lifters are available: One uses a
hydraulic cylinder to lift the cart, and the other uses a rotary actuator.
Cylinder lifts tend to be less expensive up front and suit semiautomated carts
in particular. Lifts using rotary actuators are designed for greater durability
and the ability to lift heavy weights at lower system pressures, as well as the
ability to pick up a wider range of containers.
- What kind of rotary actuator does the tipper use? The tipper’s actuator
provides the rotation needed to lift and dump the cart. Two kinds of actuators
are prevalent: helical and dual rack and pinion. Helical actuators may cost less
initially, but replacement parts are reportedly more expensive on average. Dual
rack-and-pinion actuators have fewer parts and may be easier to repair.
Collection of
yardwaste is semiautomated in Olathe, KS, where residents purchase the carts
used in a new, voluntary program, notes Darren Gilbert, assistant solid waste
manager. The carts are replacing yardwaste bags that previously were used for
clippings and bundle brush.
Gilbert says
that semiautomated collection will always be used in Olathe, largely because of
the new yardwaste program. The city has 11 routes, which are identical for trash
and recycling, and yardwaste. One of the city’s 12 fully automated trucks
handles a trash/recycling route, and two of a total of eight tipper-equipped
rear-loading trucks and tipper-equipped side-loading trucks handle a route for
either trash/recycling or yardwaste.
 |
| Photo: Otto Environmental Systems |
The city began
to automate in 2004, when it undertook a pilot program using Bayne Machine Works
TL Series tippers on its side-loaders and Rehrig Pacific carts. “We were 100%
manual collection and then in 2004, the city did a pilot program and introduced
the carts,” says Gilbert, adding that after the 1,200-customer program was
deemed a success, carts were purchased for the city’s 36,000 homes and Olathe
had all of its trucks equipped with tippers. Since then, the city has gradually
converted to 100% fully automated collection for residential trash.
The tippers use
rack-and-pinion rotary actuators and are designed to position containers deep
inside the hopper to prevent spillage and to increase the number of dumps before
packer-blade cycling is necessary. Gilbert reports that smooth operation is an
aspect of the TL Series tippers that minimizes both spillage and container
damage. “It’s pretty important when the cart’s going up; you don’t want
something that’s vibrating so it falls off,” he says. “If you have something
that jerks, you can damage the cart, or—worst-case scenario—it can hit the
ground, and then you’ve got trash all over the street.” Another benefit is a
self-greasing bearing that reduces the need for maintenance as well as the
potential to forget to lubricate the bearing.
On its
rear-loading trucks, the city uses Bayne’s BTL Series, which also uses the
rack-and-pinion rotary actuators and self-greasing bearings at the main pivot
points. This tipper is specifically designed to offer greater ground clearance
for rear-loading applications to reduce damage on uneven terrain, such as alley
entrances.
Collecting
refuse from carts bunched closely together and the ability to sometimes lift
heavier containers—and thus reduce the number of necessary collection trips to
some customers—are additional reasons why semiautomated collection remains a
viable technique, according to Perkins Manufacturing Co. Two tipper models in
particular, the D6080C Heavy Duty Rotary TuckAway Lifter and D6220 TuckAway Cart
Lifter, are equipped with features to maximize collection efficiency.
The D6080C has
been available for about 20 years and has gone through several evolutions. The
unit’s picking and dumping cycle time is about six seconds. The TuckAway design,
with which the unit recesses under the hopper, is intended to protect the tipper
from damage and prolong the life of equipment. The TuckAway’s “BreakAway”
feature reduces damage to the actuator in the event of a collision or
bottom-out.
The D6220 is
similar to the D6080C but has a more compact design that allows greater ground
clearance. It suits many trucks that are not compatible with the D6080C.
Containers, Wheels
Manufacturers
would tell you that not all containers are created equal. What a refuse
company’s customers might consider commodity items with few differentiating
features are known as anything but that by the professionals who pick up the
refuse. As the level of collection automation has increased in recent years,
manufacturers have increasingly focused on container durability and ergonomic
design.
 |
Photo: Toter Inc. Toter Inc. makes carts that suit semiautomatied and automated collection alike. |
Dave Bennett,
solid waste service coordinator for the city of Scottsdale, AZ, reports that the
city uses fully automated collection almost exclusively for its roughly 78,000
residential customers; the only exceptions are a couple of areas on the south
end of town where many seniors live—residents who would have difficulty moving
large containers out to the curb.
Realizing that
full automation is highly productive yet rough on containers, the city began
replacing its residential trash containers with Otto Environmental Systems’ Edge
residential carts in January 2008. The containers are designed to withstand the
extreme forces exerted by semi- and fully automated collection equipment. A
design feature that is included to accommodate automated systems with grabber
arms such as those used in Scottsdale is the elimination of “corners” that tend
to compress during lifting. Instead of a lift pocket, a.k.a. bib or pouch, the
container is also available with a smooth ridge around the top of the cart base,
and it is also available without a catch (or lift) bar—a feature designed for
semiautomated collection.
By the end of
winter 2008, Bennett reports, not one of the containers had cracked, a fact he
attributes to the containers’ design and use of injection-molded plastic. “The
thing in Arizona is that you not only have the heat but also the cold,” he says.
“These containers have to survive extreme heat—you’re talking 130 degrees when
it’s out in the sun, and in the winter it’s below freezing, so they have to
stand up to a lot. So far, these containers stand up to that test.”
 |
| Photo: Bayne Machine Works |
| The rear-loader counterpoint to the TL series by Bayne Machine Works is the BTL Series, which is designed with greater ground clearance for rear-oading applications. Shown here is a dual configuration for high-efficiency collection. |
To prevent
spillage, the lid is designed to stay securely closed using cylindrical
attachment elements and snap pins at the hinge. “When you squeeze, say, in the
middle with the grapple bars, the container expands either toward the bottom or
the top,” Bennett says. “This can survives all of that. We’ve picked it up every
single which-way you can, multiple times, and the lid doesn’t come off.”
Bennett says
another beneficial feature of the containers is its ease of assembly. “One big
thing is that, when they’re delivered to us, they’re pretty much fully
assembled—all we have to do is snap on a wheel and the axle,” he says. “That’s
important because when they’re delivered there’s usually around 500 cans; they
come stacked in rolls of 12, and you just have to pull that stack down and
assemble the containers yourself. You don’t have to pay extra people to come out
here and assemble them—the lids are already on, and you snap on a wheel. You
don’t have to carry extra parts, screws, et cetera. In the past, we had to
assemble the lid and the axles and it was big process and now we can assemble
them out in the field and maybe take 30 or 40 out on a route.”
Another city
that has gone to fully automated collection almost exclusively is Austin, TX.
Dale Johnson, warehouse supervisor for the city of Austin, reports that the city
converted to semiautomated collection in 1993 to save workers’ backs and then
began transitioning to fully automated collection of residential trash in 1999.
Currently, he estimates that about 70% of 181,000 customers’ residential
collection there is fully automated. The remaining 30% of customers who require
semiautomated collection mainly live in student housing in this major college
town, the home of the University of Texas at Austin. These areas tend to be
crowded and curbside refuse is packed tightly together, making fully automated
collection difficult, Johnson explains.
The city uses
Toter Inc.’s EVR I and EVR II carts, which can be used for both fully automated
and semiautomated collection. One differentiating feature in the carts that the
company promotes is its patented, stress-free Advanced Rotational Molding
technology, providing greater durability.
Another
differentiating feature, according to the manufacturer, is the fact that the
steel lifting bar is sealed on the interior of the container with a double wall;
this keeps out moisture and insects that can damage the container and reduce its
working life. Additionally, the bar rotates on its own axis, providing play that
increases the bar’s durability. Noting that many refuse companies and
municipalities replace their fully automated lifting equipment or tippers
several times during the life of containers, these carts are also said to be
compatible with any US collection system.
“These seem to
hold up and work really well and meet our needs,” Johnson says. “We really don’t
have cart failure at all—we’ve got some containers out there that we’ve been
using since 1993, and I expect that we’ll still get a few more years out of
them.”
Another
manufacturer, Rehrig Pacific Co., offers universal HuskyLite Roll-out Carts,
which are available in capacities of 20, 35, 65, and 95 gallons and have a
one-piece, molded-in handle and a built-in foot tilter for maneuverability. The
top lip is reinforced, and molded-in lift points are designed for strength and
rigidity. The carts are shipped with the lids already attached and the wheels
snap on for reduced assembly time. The manufacturer uses injection molding to
add extra reinforcing material in load-bearing points and high-wear areas. The
resulting rigidity is incorporated to prevent bending and pinching, a particular
problem in fully automated collection. The carts are also designed with smooth
interiors to eliminate catch areas. Ergonomic features include large, heavy-duty
handles and an integrated foot tilter on the company’s 65-and 95-gallon carts. A
ground-hugging base is designed to keep the units stable in high winds and on
uneven terrain.
Rehrig
Pacific’s plastic 25- and 32-gallon cans suit manual and fully automated
collection alike. The company points out that they also can be used for any type
of refuse. Their relatively greater height compared with recycling bins, for
example, makes manual or semiautomated collection easier on workers. To
compensate for a taller profile, however, the bottoms of the cans have
additional weight. Additional ergonomic features include large spaces between
the handles and the sides of the cans, as well as drag rails that allow workers
to drag them across the ground. Injection-molded HDPE resin is used for superior
durability.
Like
the containers themselves, wheels on rollout carts are anything but a commodity.
Roll-Tech LLC specializes in rubber-tread wheels for rollout trash containers.
The advantage of rubber wheels, the manufacturer notes, is that of less noise
during maneuvering. Durability is an additional benefit, according to the
manufacturer; unlike plastic units, the rubber wheels keep moisture out and
prevent freeze-thaw deterioration prevalent in northern climates. The company
also promotes the eco-friendly aspect of the recycled crumb rubber and recycled
plastic wheel hubs.