|


 |
|
Neal Bolton
|
By
Neal Bolton
After
a routine physical checkup, Joe met with his doctor
to go over the results.
"You're overweight,
Joe," the doctor said.
"Yeah, I know."
"In fact," the doctor
continued, "you need to trim off 48 pounds."
"OK," agreed Joe.
"Any questions?"
"No, doc. I understand.
I have to lose 48 pounds."
"Right," said the doctor.
"I'll see you next year."
Joe left the doctor's office
that day with no details, no plan, and no hope of success.
Forty-eight pounds Š it's overwhelming. Joe would have
had a much better chance of trimming the excess weight
if he'd gotten more detailed information, if he'd focused.
Would Joe have been more
likely to succeed if his goal were to lose 4 lb./month,
or 1 lb./week, or even 2 oz./day? Probably. Would the
task have seemed less daunting if Joe knew that simply
taking a 20-minute walk each day or ordering regular
instead of "super-size" meals would tip the scales his
way? You bet.
So what does this have
to do with landfill? Well, that afternoon Joe the landfill
manager was at a budget meeting.
"Joe, the landfill budget
is too fat," his boss said.
"Yeah, I know."
"In fact," the boss
continued, "you need to trim off $48,000."
"OK," agreed Joe.
"Any questions?"
"No, boss, I understand.
I have to reduce expenses by $48,000."
"Right," said the boss.
"I'll see you next month."
Sound familiar? Same lack
of details. Same slim chance of success.
Trying to lose weight or
save money based on vague goals is - at best - difficult.
At worst, it's downright impossible.
To help you understand
how to focus for success at your landfill, let's go
through an example. We'll start from a broad perspective
and then slowly focus on a specific piece of the operation.
The landfill's annual budget
is $2 million/year. The facility takes in 300 tpd of
waste. That's good information, it's interesting, but
it's too broad to allow much room for tweaking. We need
to focus.
The dozer costs $475,000.
Again, it's good, interesting information. And perhaps
it might stimulate you into thinking about shopping
around for a better price for the next dozer you buy.
But it's still too broad. Need to focus more.
The dozer costs $125/hour
to operate. So how can we save money? Perhaps we could
cut back the dozer's hours. But can you decrease the
hours and maintain productivity? Perhaps, but we need
to look closer.
What, in fact, does the
dozer do? It pushes from the tipping area to the active
face. Right. Let's say that the dozer works eight hours
per day at $125/hour, so its daily cost is $1,000. Furthermore,
let's say we've measured and found that its average
push distance is 80 ft. If we break this down one step
further, we find that under the dozer's current scenario,
pushing costs $12.50/ft. - every day.
Can you visualize $12.50/ft.
better than "The dozer costs $475,000 to purchase" or
"It costs $125/hour to operate"? Me too.
With this information,
you can brainstorm with your crew to find ways to shorten
the average push distance. For example, shortening the
push distance by 10 ft. saves $125/day, or $37,500/year.
Now we're talking. We've focused down to a level where
we not only can understand where the money's going but
now we also might be able to get our hands on some of
it.
Now that we've got the
operation in focus, let's look around and see what else
might turn up. Using the same logic, calculate how much
it costs per (dozer) push. Again, it's eight hours per
day multiplied by $125/hour. The daily cost is $1,000/day.
If, on average, the dozer makes 100 pushes per day,
each push costs $10. So to save money, you just need
to make fewer pushes. No can do, you say? Check this
out.
On a normal push (e.g.,
gather, push, spread, and return), the dozer can carry
6-10 tons of trash. And, as we just calculated, that
6- to 10-ton "push" costs $10. During the busy times,
that's cool.
But what happens during
the slow times, when no trucks are coming in? In most
cases, wanting to keep busy, the operator will make
a few "cleanup" pushes. You know, he's just cleaning
up trash that spilled off the edge of the blade during
the last few pushes. They aren't big loads; maybe a
quarter- or half-ton per push. But those pushes still
cost $10 a piece. Over the course of a day, a big percentage
of the dozer's pushes are pretty "wimpy." Continually
cleaning up a handful of spilled trash with a big dozer
is a waste of time and money.
While most of us might
consider hiring the kid next door to rake the leaves
in our yard, we'd never hire someone to be on hand to
rake up every leaf as it falls. To do so would be a
silly waste of money. So why are we encouraging the
dozer to do this very thing at our landfills every day?
Probably because we are working from the mindset that
says, "Keep busy. If there's nothing to do, find something."
So the dozer keeps on pushing.
What if the dozer refused
to push wimpy loads and just let the spilled trash build
up over the course of the day - and didn't clean it up
until the last truckload had been pushed: What would
happen? No, the sky would not fall. First off, the dozer
would make a lot fewer pushes. Let's assume it went
from 100 pushes per day to 60. At $10/push, that represents
a savings of $400/day, or $120,000/year.
As a side benefit, as the
spilled trash builds up along the dozer's push path,
it starts to create a berm, or windrow. The dozer is
in effect beginning to "slot doze." And as a result,
subsequent pushes can carry more trash because less
trash is spilled around the edge of the blade.
Do you get the picture?
So did Joe. Using the concept of focusing, he was able
to save a lot more than the $48,000 his boss asked for.
Oh, and if you want more information, don't call the
landfill and ask for Joe. They won't know who the heck
you're talking about. These days, everybody calls him
"Slim."
Neal Bolton
is a consultant specializing in landfill operations
and management. He is principal of Blue Ridge Services
in Atascadero, CA, and author of The Handbook of Landfill
Operations
MSW
- July/August 2003
|