|


Art
might be in the eye of the beholder, but for one Washington
community, it lies within a unique transfer station
nicknamed "ARTS."
By
Karl Hufnagel and Mark Westenskow
As it has become for many counties across the country,
keeping up with the times became a challenge in Snohomish
County, WA (population 620,000), north of Seattle.
Facing a landfill closure in 1992, Snohomish County restructured
its solid waste management program to a long-haul
waste-by-rail system. By 2002, however, the county's
three recycling and transfer stations were processing
more than 440,000 tpy of waste. The two busiest stations
were constructed in the 1970s around a direct-dump
pushpit and small-compactor transfer concept designed
for daily tonnage throughput of less than 200 tpd.
These stations had become seriously outmoded and incapable
of keeping up with the county's growing waste tonnage.
Customers endured lengthy delays, service restrictions,
and frequent equipment malfunctions.
In the late
1990s, the county embarked on a program to replace these
two stations with state-of-the-art facilities, each
capable of handling at least 1,500 tpd - many times
the original station capacity.
The new Airport Road Recycling and Transfer Station (ARTS)
was sited adjacent to a large commercial airport,
which in itself presented some significant design
challenges.
In addition, the new station layout completely changed
the operational methods used by the county.
During the design phase, the county's consultant team
worked to develop a facility that is efficient, can
safely accommodate large numbers of commercial and
self-haul customers simultaneously, and provides a
safe, healthy, and pleasant environment for both customers
and staff.
Scale Facility
Automation: No Time to Wait
Site constraints for the 10-ac. site did not allow for
the development of long, prescale queuing lanes for
station customers. This dictated the need for a rapid-transaction
scale facility consisting of four shallow-pit truck
scales, lane-control lights, scale entrance and exit
gates and lights, automated vehicle identification
and data capture for scales 1 and 4, unattended ticket
receipt printers for scales 1 and 4, and traffic-control
modules. The facility is capable of processing peak-period
customer arrivals (estimated to be 123 vehicles per
hour) while avoiding long queues.
A four-scale plaza with one reversible UniBridge scale
(scale 3) is a central element in the design of this
area of the facility.
Equally
important to the efficient processing of customers
is the reliance on a highly automated scale transaction
process. The reversible scale, when operated as an
inbound scale, provides a total of three inbound scales.
Illuminated lane-availability signs on the face of the
scale-plaza canopy identify whether a particular scale
is closed (red X), open to self-haul and nonaccount
commercial customers (green arrow), or open only to
commercial-account customers (yellow X).
On weekdays, commercial-customer traffic at the station
predominates. Regular commercial-account traffic uses
the outboard scales (scales 1 and 4) when entering
and leaving. These two normally unattended scales
are fully automated and use PC Automation's Automatic
Identification and Data Capture technology to minimize
the transaction time and labor costs. Radio-frequency
identification equipment (vehicle-mounted transponder
and canopy-mounted antennae) provides the necessary
link between the truck and the scale data management
system. Automated semaphore scale entry and exit gates
backed by red and green "stop" and "go" lights are
linked to the scale data management system through
one PC Automation microprocessor-based Traffic Control
Module per scale. Digital readouts and remote ticket
printers at the normally unattended outboard scales
complete the automation package.
Self-haul and nonaccount commercial customers are guided
through scale 2, an attended scale. This scale also
is equipped to operate in a highly automated mode.
For example, even when the scale attendant is present,
the gates and lights for scales 2 and 3 can be operated
by the respective Traffic Control Module instead of
by foot switches.
Scale house 1, located between scales 2 and 3, is double-sided
with transaction windows and equipment on both sides.
During peak periods, two attendants will work within
this building.
Scale house 2 is located between scales 3 and 4 and is
essentially identical in arrangement to scale house
1. During less busy times, scale house 2 is unattended,
with commercial-account customers having unknown tare
weight scaling out with an automated transaction on
scale 4. The remaining commercial and self-haul customers
weigh out on scale 3 with an attendant transaction
from scale house 1. Commercial customers with known
tare weight and minimum-fee customers may bypass the
scale facility when exiting.
On
weekends, self-haul customers predominate, with possible
peak traffic counts of more than 1,000 vehicles on
a busy day. During these periods, scale 1 can be operated
as an attended self-haul scale since it includes a
small but well-equipped booth. This provides a total
of three attended inbound scales (scales 1, 2, and
3), each with a dedicated attendant. If necessary,
all exiting customers use scale 4 and are processed
by a second attendant in scale house 2. As on weekdays,
a bypass exit lane is provided for minimum-fee customers
and those billed with known tare weights, which do
not need to weigh out.
Natural
Lighting: Seeing Is Believing
The facility siting adjacent to an airport necessitated
a fully enclosed transfer building to avoid becoming
a bird attractant. The resulting enclosed building
is very large, with a receiving floor measuring nearly
203 ft. from sidewall to sidewall and 275 ft. from
end to end, with 35 ft. of unobstructed clearance
required above the floor.
Concerns about light escaping from overhead skylights
distracting pilots and about contrasting light levels
disorienting drivers when vehicles transition from
outdoor to indoor operating areas led to the use of
extensive, translucent sidewall panels to naturally
balance brightness levels.
The daylighting
design is complemented by electric lighting, with a
total of 88 400-W high-bay, metal halide luminaires
that augment natural lighting levels to maintain 30
foot-candles at floor level to ensure safe and efficient
operation in the driving and receiving areas. The proportion
of natural and artificial lighting is electronically
and automatically tuned to coordinate changes in the
natural light source, resulting in energy savings by
avoiding unnecessary electrical lighting. This Wide-Lite
system also will compensate automatically for the change
in light output as the fixtures age and lenses become
dirty between cleanings.
The following
three variable-level lighting systems were evaluated
to determine the most appropriate one for balancing
the artificial and natural lighting levels:
- Turning
on and off certain luminaires. This method was
not very desirable due to the resulting large variation
in lighting levels and the long warm-up time of
metal halide lamps. This also would shorten the
lamp life.
- Stepping
the lighting levels, using two or three steps.
This method actually would adjust the light output
in definite steps with corresponding reduction in
energy consumption. This method also was not very
desirable since it appeared that this type of lighting
control is intended for the reduction of lighting
levels when the space is not occupied and since
it results in a rather large variation in lighting
levels (steps). It was felt that this was too drastic
of a change to be comfortable to the staff.
- Continuously
variable lighting level. This system uses dimming
ballasts and a dimming control system to continuously
change the light output of the high-intensity discharge
luminaires as required to maintain the set lighting
level. This system appeared to be the most desirable.
The
building was divided into three zones - north, south,
and center, with photoelectric sensing to determine
the lighting level of each zone - and three separate
dimming-system zone controllers. This arrangement
permits each zone to respond to and complement the
varying amount of natural lighting available for the
different zones.
Economic evaluations were made for these systems to determine
if the expense of installing adjustable lighting was
justifiable. The study indicated an annual energy
savings of $1,500, not including the savings resulting
from greatly extended lamp life, and a payback of
approximately 15 years for the continuously variable
light-level system. Based on this analysis, the design
team proceeded with this option.
Another potential effect of sunlight that was less welcomed
involved concerns from the nearby Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) air-traffic controllers regarding
glare. During the design process, the FAA voiced a
concern that sunlight reflected from the roof of the
main building might result in glare that would interfere
with viewing aircraft. Building designers addressed
this concern by specifying a low-reflectivity finish
on the metal roof and preparing an easy-to-visualize,
computerized glare study. The study used a computerized
mockup of the transfer station building and the sun's
location throughout the year and was packaged in a
CD-ROM for presentation to the FAA. The two-part strategy
of low-reflectivity materials - Morin Corporation's
steel panel with PPG Industries' Duranar fluoropolymer
low-gloss coating and portable, easy-to-understand
graphic analysis - has been adopted as the standard
for other facilities under design at this airport.
Dust
and Odor: A Breath of Fresh Air
Dust and
odor control systems combine with multiple gas-detection
systems to provide a healthy atmosphere. The health
and welfare of the employees and customers were given
a high priority by the station designers, especially
within the waste-handling areas of the transfer building
where dust, odors, and potentially harmful gases (carbon
monoxide and nitrogen dioxide from vehicle exhaust and
chlorine from spills) are a constant threat.
Three separate
systems are employed to protect this area.
The first
system is a NuTech Environmental Corp. five-zone, water-based
dust/odor control misting system installed in the main
waste-handling areas. This system uses atomized water
droplets to help capture and settle airborne dust and
can include odor-neutralizing agents. The system is
split into two high-pressure, low-volume zones near
the ceiling above the most active floor areas and three
medium-pressure zones above the throats of the two waste
compactor chutes and in the throat of the topload hopper
that normally will be used for loading yardwaste and
hard-to-handle waste (e.g., stumps, large pieces of
concrete, or loads of dirt) that would be better handled
this way than by being processed through the compactors.
Each zone is separately remote-controlled by the operating
staff using hand-held wireless controllers.
 |
The second
system is a ducted dust-extraction system with intake
grills above and behind each of the two Shredding Systems
Inc. compactor chutes. The areas immediately above the
chutes are very dusty due to the waste dropping 12 ft.
to the floor of the compactor. Each compactor chute
has its own MAC Equipment Inc. dust-extraction system
consisting of a 15,000-cfm cartridge-filter dust collector
with automatic pulse-jet air cleaning. The filtered
exhaust air is discharged from a stack above the roofline.
The two dust-collection systems are designed to operate
completely independently of each other since the compactors
might not be running simultaneously. With the system
controls in the "Auto" position, these systems operate
on demand from the same hand-held wireless controllers
used for the misting systems. The dust-extraction system
controls are interlocked with those of the medium-pressure
misting systems via a programmable logic controller
to prevent moisture-laden dust from being extracted
and blinding the dust filter bags.
A Mine Safety Appliances Company gas detection and alarm
system provides the third protective measure for the
transfer building. This system consists of multiple
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and chlorine detectors
with both audible and visual alarms inside and at
the entrances to the transfer building. Since chlorine
would most likely enter the building in a liquid container
in the wastestream, the sensor for this gas is located
on the mobile floor loader close to where a broken
container would be. The input from this sensor is
transmitted by wireless radio signal back to the central
monitor and recording system in the electrical room.
Similar gas-detection equipment is located in other
areas of the facility, including in the compactor
level of the transfer building, in the employee building,
and in the scale houses.
The success achieved in these three areas of the facility
design reflect the excellence that the county's consultant
team obtained throughout the facility and is largely
a result of the county's ability to fully integrate
its operations staff into the planning and design
process.
Karl Hufnagel is a senior project manager with R.W.
Beck Inc. in Seattle, WA. Mark Westenskow is the Airport
Road Recycling and Transfer Station project manager
for the Snohomish Count (WA) Solid Waste Management
Division.
MSW
- March/April 2004
|