|


By
John H. Skinner
Earlier this year the SWANA
Applied Research Foundation issued a report entitled
The Effectiveness of Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills in Controlling the Releases of Heavy Metals
into the Environment. Its basic conclusion is that
MSW landfills can provide for safe disposal of products
containing heavy metals without exceeding limits that
have been established to protect human health and the
environment. While SWANA stands behind that conclusion,
this does not mean that landfill is the preferred waste
management strategy for electronic wastes or other metal-containing
products. We believe that there are a number of very
persuasive reasons to recycle and reuse electronic products
regardless of whether landfills are effective in controlling
the release of heavy metals.
The environmental advantages
of electronics reuse and recycling are described in
detail in the recently issued SWANA training manual
on establishing an electronics recycling program. First
of all, recycling saves energy because producing products
from recycled materials consumes much less energy than
from raw materials. The reuse of products conserves
the energy used in product manufacture. Therefore, recycling
and reuse can significantly reduce the consumption of
energy from such nonrenewable fossil fuels as coal,
imported oil, and natural gas and significantly reduce
the environmental emissions from energy production,
including greenhouse gases and mercury.
Second, recycling and reuse
avoid the adverse environmental impacts of mining, harvesting,
and processing raw materials, including the impacts
of soil erosion, habitat destruction, and the adverse
effects on water and air resources. In the case of used
electronics, reuse and recycling would avoid oil production
for the plastics and would avoid precious-metal mining
for the circuit boards and other components.
Third, many electronic
products fail the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
and would be required to be handled as hazardous waste
under federal law if they were discarded by commercial
or industrial generators. Disposal of such products
in MSW landfills would be a violation of federal regulations
and could subject the generator, transporter, and landfill
operator to civil and criminal enforcement actions.
Finally, reuse and recycling
can reduce the need for and the costs of long-term monitoring
and care of landfills, including the potentially very
high costs of future corrective action, if necessary.
These costs can continue for decades after a landfill
closes and would have to be borne by future generations.
As evidence of this support
for recycling and reuse, SWANA's international board
of directors unanimously approved our Product Stewardship
Policy in 2001. Its purpose is to establish guiding principles for
SWANA and its members to use as they collaborate with
manufacturers and designers in developing programs
to manage products at the end of their life. To quote
from that document, which can be found in its entirety
on our Web site:
"Policies
that promote and implement product stewardship principles
should create incentives for the manufacturer to design
and produce products that are made using less energy,
materials, and potential pollutants, and which result
in less waste (through reduction, reuse, recycling,
and composting) and use less energy to operate. These
policies should also create incentives for the development
of a sustainable and environmentally-sound system to
collect, reuse, and recycle or dispose of products at
the end of their lives."
SWANA supports
as a first priority practices that reduce the quantity
of solid waste and practices that recycle and recover
value from waste. Recycling and reuse of electronic
products result in many benefits from a resource use
and environmental perspective. Efforts that involve
manufacturers, retailers, and designers in programs
to collect, reuse, and recycle electronic products are
fully consistent with SWANA's Product Stewardship Policy.
John
H. Skinner is Executive Director and CEO of SWANA and
a member of MSW Management's Editorial
Advisory Board.
MSW
- September/October 2004
|