From: Landfill Gas Collection System Efficiencies
Table Five
LFG Collection System Efficiencies Based on Field Tests - Summary |
| Investigator |
Landfill |
Season |
LFG Collection System Efficiency
(LFG Collected/LFG Generated) |
| Average Per Sampling Event |
Average Per
Landfill |
|
|
|
Average Per Sampling Event |
Average Per
Landfill |
| Bentley |
North Shelby Landfill |
N/A |
82.5% |
82.5% |
| Spokaset. al. |
Montreuil-sur-Barse |
N/A |
93.6% |
93.6% |
|
Lapouyade |
Summer |
90.3% |
94.2% |
|
|
Winter |
98.1% |
|
|
Grand Landes |
Summer |
88.1% |
86.0% |
|
|
Winter |
83.8% |
|
| Huitric1 |
Palos Verdes (2006 – Urban Mode) |
N/A |
99.3% |
99.3% |
| Average |
90.8% |
91.1% |
Std. Dev. |
6.6% |
6.8% |
| 1LFG collection efficiency is defined at this landfill as LFG collected through the LFG collection system as well as LFG (methane) oxidized in landfill cover soils as compared to the LFG that is collected, oxidized and/or emitted to the atmosphere. |
July 1, 2008
From: Landfill Gas Collection System Efficiencies
Table Five
LFG Collection System Efficiencies Based on Field Tests - Summary |
| Investigator |
Landfill |
Season |
LFG Collection System Efficiency
(LFG Collected/LFG Generated) |
| Average Per Sampling Event |
Average Per
Landfill |
|
|
|
Average Per Sampling Event |
Average Per
Landfill |
| Bentley |
North Shelby Landfill |
N/A |
82.5% |
82.5% |
| Spokaset. al. |
Montreuil-sur-Barse |
N/A |
93.6% |
93.6% |
|
Lapouyade |
Summer |
90.3% |
94.2% |
|
|
Winter |
98.1% |
|
|
Grand Landes |
Summer |
88.1% |
86.0% |
|
|
Winter |
83.8% |
|
| Huitric1 |
Palos Verdes (2006 – Urban Mode) |
N/A |
99.3% |
99.3% |
| Average |
90.8% |
91.1% |
Std. Dev. |
6.6% |
6.8% |
| 1LFG collection efficiency is defined at this landfill as LFG collected through the LFG collection system as well as LFG (methane) oxidized in landfill cover soils as compared to the LFG that is collected, oxidized and/or emitted to the atmosphere. |